Layout Image

Archive for General

Dr. Vandana Shiva invites you to join her in India with Global Exchange

Global Exchange Reality Tours is planning a Rights of Nature; Rights of Seeds Tour to India with Dr. Vandana Shiva for November 1 – November 11, 2013.

“While India is such a beautiful and diverse country and culture and all [Global Exchange Reality] tours explore its rich history, political economy, and current social and ecological issues, what makes this particular trip spectacular are the trip leaders and their phenomenal experience. Trip participants will learn not only from the people, communities and organizations you will visit in India, but from each other and from organic conversations and formal lectures by Vandana Shiva and Global Exchange’s Community Rights Program Director Shannon Biggs.”

“I think it would be a really good idea at this moment in time, to do a Global Exchange trip to India on the issue of the seed…and the link to rights of Mother Earth. I mean where does all life begin? You begin with the seed.” Vandana Shiva collaborating with Shannon Biggs of Global Exchange

This journey will be an unforgettable opportunity of a life time to explore the deepest essence of Rights of Nature with Dr. Vandana Shiva on her Navdanya farm led by Shannon Biggs of Global Exchange.

Watch as Vandana describes the trip herself …

Learn more at India: Rights of Nature with Dr. Vandana Shiva 

Rights of Nature on the Santa Monica City Council Agenda

Rights of Nature is included the City of Santa Monica, California’s proposed Sustainability Rights Ordinance that recognizes “Natural communities and ecosystems possess fundamental and inalienable rights to exist and flourish in the City Of Santa Monica.”  The Introduction and First Reading of the ordinance is on the Santa Monica City Council Meeting Agenda for March 12, 2013.

Sustainable City Plan The rights described in the Ordinance will be advanced in part by Santa Monica’s model Sustainable City Plan, which is being updated now and which sets out specific sustainability actions and goals.

The Executive Summary introducing the Ordinance Establishing Sustainable Rights for Santa Monica residents and the natural environment states “Following previous direction by Council, staff has prepared an ordinance that codifies the commitments made in the Sustainable City Plan and asserts the fundamental rights of all Santa Monica residents regarding sustainability. The ordinance also establishes the rights of natural communities and ecosystems to exist and flourish in Santa Monica and asserts the rights of residents to enforce those rights on behalf of the environment.  The ordinance establishes that corporate entities do not possess special privileges or powers under the law that subordinate the community’s rights.”

The Ordinance also articulates the rights of people to self-governance and sustainable living. It declares that “all residents of Santa Monica possess fundamental and inalienable rights to: clean water from sustainable sources; marine waters safe for active and passive recreation; clean indoor and outdoor air; a sustainable food system that provides healthy, locally grown food; a sustainable climate that supports thriving human life and a flourishing biodiverse environment; comprehensive waste disposal systems that do not degrade the environment; and a sustainable energy future based on renewable energy sources.”

Alliance members from Earth Law Center, Global Exchange and Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund are pleased to have been partnering with the City of Santa Monica staff and Task Force on the Environment since its inception.

Large scale mining in Ecuador – Domingo Ankuash, Shuar

Domingo Ankuash speaks on behalf of the Shaur and Indigenous Peoples of Ecuador about the threat of the proposed Mirador open pit mining project.

This video has been created to bring to the eyes of the world the situation in South Eastern Ecuador. The government of Ecuador signed a contract with a Chinese company giving it the right to exploit the land, without consulting the inhabitants, thus violating the Constitution. This contract will lead to the extinction of the indigenous peoples from this area and their culture.

Shuar people reject the “invasion” of Chinese and Canadian corporations and the development of mines on their land and affirm that they will defend their territories until the last.

Environmental, human rights, indigenous organizations, and local community members from the Condor region in Ecuador have joined together to file a lawsuit to stop the Mirador Mining Project.  The suit claims that the mine would violate the protected rights of ecosystems per the Articles on Rights of Nature in the Ecuador Constitution. The case is now being heard by the Ecuadorian court in Mirador.

For more information visit:

http://therightsofnature.org/latin-america/the-case-for-rights-of-nature-in-face-of-the-mirador-open-pit-copper-mining-project/
http://protectecuador.org/

All I need to know I learned in the forest

by Dr. Vandana Shiva

Rights of Nature On the Global Stage

When nature is a teacher, we ­co-create with her—we recognize her agency and her rights. That is why it is significant that Ecuador has recognized the “rights of nature” in its constitution. In April 2011, the United Nations General Assembly­—inspired by the constitution of Ecuador and the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth initiated by Bolivia—organized a conference on harmony with nature as part of Earth Day celebrations. Much of the discussion centered on ways to transform systems based on domination of people over nature, men over women, and rich over poor into new systems based on partnership.
We need to overcome the wider and deeper apartheid—an eco-apartheid based on the illusion of separateness of humans from nature in our minds and lives.

The U.N. secretary general’s report, “Harmony with Nature,” issued in conjunction with the conference, elaborates on the importance of reconnecting with nature: “Ultimately, environmentally destructive behavior is the result of a failure to recognize that human beings are an inseparable part of nature and that we cannot damage it without severely damaging ourselves.”

Separatism is indeed at the root of disharmony with nature and violence against nature and people. As the prominent South African environmentalist Cormac Cullinan points out, apartheid means separateness. The world joined the anti-apartheid movement to end the violent separation of people on the basis of color. Apartheid in South Africa was put behind us. Today, we need to overcome the wider and deeper apartheid—an eco-apartheid based on the illusion of separateness of humans from nature in our minds and lives.

Read the article in YES! Magazine at All I need to know I learned in the forest by Dr Vandana Shiva, YES! Magazine

 

We First Book Video: “We-defining Me”

Redefining Capitalism to put “WE” first

This video is well worth the few minutes to watch!

We-defining Me written and performed by Sekou Andrews (http://www.sekouworld.com). Design and animation by Troika (http://www.troika.tv). Original music and sound design by Machine Head (http://www.machinehead.com).

www.WeFirstBranding.com

Diritti della Natura Italia – Rights of Nature in Italy

Submitted by Davide Sapienza, Diritti della Natura Italia
www.davidesapienza.it

Diritti della Natura Italia - Rights of Nature banner

On our newly launched website www.dirittidellanaturaitalia.it we introduce ourselves with the statement “we feel part of The Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature”. In the next line we declare, “we underwrite the Universal Declaration for the rights of Mother Earth”.

This, because in the first line of the written body you see a date: March 30, 2012. This day, a Friday, it is not just another date. Yes, there was already a “first” in 2011 when I was invited, as a writer, to conduct a conference at the Bergamo Scienza festival at my own choice. It was 6 October 2011 and I called it “Forests: The Future of Nature”, inspired both to the famous Orion Magazine book of 2007 and an essay I wrote in 2008 and published in a couple of books (including my own literary manifesto of 2004, “I Diari di Rubha Hunish” in the new 2011 edition). But that “first” was a stage in the long walk of five years, mostly alone, that helped me to focus and elaborate the whole thing.

In the last couple of years I realized a friend like Paolo Locatelli, formerly provincial head of Legambiente Bergamo for 10 years, could be the one who could go “the other way”, in regard to the “environmental groups” that to me seemed not to comprehend fully the real paradigm shift that we needed and that we were proposing. Paolo got the “spirit” before he got the “tools”. It had happened to me, as well. Of course: this is all new to our society, but we both had the feeling that something was missing and that to turn in the other direction, we had to go back to the fundamental truths of Indigenous peoples.

In the smalltown of Alzano Lombardo, just on the outskirts of Bergamo, I had the chance to set up a major event and invite Mari Margil. Little I knew that her “partner” was none other than Thomas Linzey. I found out when they got to Bergamo’s train station who the “partner” was. By then, also our lawyer Francesca Mancini was in the party. She got in touch with me from Australia, a week before the October 2011 conference: she was exactly attending conferences with people such as Cormac Cullinan and Alessandro Pellizon to discover more about “rights of nature”. Being Italian, she wondered if someone had worked on the issue. She found me. I had written something in our media – who mostly turned down proposals of stories – and found many many obstacles in the major media I wrote for between 2005 and 2009. Of course. That was their teaching: still, this is lingering in some of the less sleepy ones who are in the media and it eventually become “news”. I know that for sure. Don’t ask me “evidence”. I am Tao. I Live. I do not measure. And then, in December 2011, one of the three founding members of small company dedicated to renewable energies, INNTEA (www.inntea.it), from the same Mountain area where I live since 1990, called me and said: “we want to work with ethics. We work with biomasess and small hydro plants, and we need to know we are doing the right things. Because we work with the Sun (solar energy), we want to know that if we cut trees or work in a creek, we are doing something sustainable, something we can account for with our children”. They hired me to “think” and “imagine” for them. When I said “Rights of Nature”, they said: we want this. We want to make a conference. We have a budget for this: we have a budget for a new culture to be nurtured. I also want to do something I can account for my little one of 3 years old. When he wakes up, and sees our beautiful Presolana range from the kitchen balcony, he says to me “daddy write the book of mother Earth”. So, I have to be consistent.

Therefore I made up my mind: to hell with the media, enslaved by their owners (corporations and big publishing groups) and their fake interest in the “environment”. The first thing I did for INNTEA was to remove the word “ambiente”, “environment” from their website and ads. Let us call it for what it is: Mother Earth, Madre Terra. Nature. Natural resources. LIFE. COMMUNITY OF BEINGS. The second thing I did, was to write to Mari Margil, to me, the lighthouse in the distance all along these last five years. But more was to come. Mari said yes, Francesca said yes, we established March 30 as The Day.

In that same December 2011 something else happened. I found a sensitive publisher to translate Cormac Cullinan’s WILD LAW. The book was suggested to me by Mari Margil (of course!). Mari, is the first person of the Global Alliance I got in contact with in September 2008, while ready to fly to Canada to write about the problems with forests. Ecuador was ready to vote the revolution of Law, we started to correspond. During that summer I had tried to explain what I then knew about rights of nature to some big heads of Legambiente.  It was useless. Maybe I was not that good at explaining but they said the usual “but with our laws this is impossible”. Of course! They had the answer inbuilt in their denial!

But here I have to say something about the very first human being that started to make me focus both as an Author and and as a person on what I already felt so strongly (even through my work for poets like Cheyenne Lance Henson and Sioux-Santee John Trudell in the early ’90s) was Barry Lopez. A friend, a maestro, the greatest living writer. All his Work is “rights of nature” turned into poetic truths. “Of Wolves and Men” is IT and since then I was “in”.

But this is now. March 30, 2012.

For this conference I invited Mari Margil and Francesca Mancini. The idea was to explain the very basic and simple truth about rights of Nature. Over 120 people attended that afternoon and Mari, Thomas and Francesca were hosted by me translating what Mari and Thomas were explaining and linking that to the speech Francesca had so thoughtfully and carefully set up, a run through of our Italian Constitution history since 1947 and why we do not even consider “Nature” in our foundation as post-WWII nation. This is why our press office for INNTEA, e.20, had the great idea of writing a letter to our President that Francesca had written out so well.

The conference was really something. I even saw a few representatives of “environmental groups”. Not one from WWF or Legambiente. They are too”big” and they work with the same paradigm as the politicians they ostensibly oppose. I had the same feeling when traveling across the Arctic and writing about Seal Hunt in Newfoundland and other “hot issues”: I had the feeling that for them (at the headquarters level) it was not about the rights of nature, but the rights of human beings to decide a new hierarchy in the Natural world. This, I said on the March 30th conference. And this I said on the October 2011 conference. In that first public appearance in Italy of “rights of Nature”, I remember that I asked to distribute photocopies of the Universal Declaration to the People. I also remember very well how people reacted in seeing that paper: “what? We already have a document? Great!”. It was a turning point. Because People just need tools to act with, People do not need more “politics” from our actions. They expect “actions”, like the Global Alliance is doing. In the same week of our Rights of Nature conference a wonderful Junghian synchronicity made it possible that, in Bergamo, Vandana Shiva was meeting people at a conference and in a local school, here in the mountains, 2 miles away from my home. Amazing? Amazing. But not really. Just right.

At the conference the emotional swell of the People, really urged me to announce, “today we declare the birth of Diritti della Natura Italia”. It was not planned. It just so was. It had to be. In two weeks, we have set up a website, we are meeting other associations and getting in touch with “situations” which we hope can turn into something important, because we need a first “case” in Italy to make it clear that we are NOT an environmental association. A friend has started work to put “rights of Nature” at work in the Dolomites, the world famous Italian mountain range that was declared World Heritage a couple of years ago. We want to go beyond that. Our friend is working on it and on August 20th, in Corvara (Bolzano), in the Badia Valley we will make a conference to present Cormac Cullinan’s book, the “manual” to our work. The book will be launched on May 1st in Bergamo at the Bookshops Fair, and I am very proud I was able to translate and edit the book for the Italian version so quickly. When I spoke to Cormac he was quite stunned for how quickly we did the job. It was necessary, though, because to me it was all intertwined: the conference in October 2011, the work for the conference in Alzano Lombardo and the future.

We are a group that is a part of a network, an “open source” to be enriched by outside ideas and actions, and the other way around. I am NOT an “environmentalist”. I am a male, from the Human Species. I am part of the Earth. I am writer and I am what I write. Because what I write is the way I convey what my Community, the Earth, is telling me to do. In Alzano Lombardo Mari and Thomas really explained “what is Rights of Nature” and showed the way to go, in practical terms. Francesca Mancini and Paolo Locatelli are the ones, for the practical way to go. I spread the word: I am good at what I am good, and that is what I am doing. I work on the subtle, spiritual, intimate part of this. I work for the Poetic Justice, like my friend John Trudell calls his strong tie to Mother Earth: and it so happens, this is what rights of nature is also part of.

Davide Sapienza, father of Leonardo, husband of Cristina.

www.davidesapienza.it

Rights of Nature submissions to Rio+20 Zero Draft Document

Multiple member States and Major Groups included Rights of Nature and Rights of Mother Earth petitions in their submissions to the Rio+20 Zero Draft Document.  Among them are the following submissions:

Member States

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Proposal of the Plurinational State of Bolivia for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20)

See complete submission at http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&type=510&nr=454&menu=20

The Rights of Nature

The proposals developed by the Plurinational State of Bolivia bring together and build upon the progress made in the World Charter for Nature (1982), the Rio Declaration (1992), the Earth Charter (2000), and the World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth (2010):

I. A DEEPER COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY

In this century, the central challenges of sustainable development are: on the one hand, to overcome poverty and the tremendous inequalities that exist and, on the other hand, reestablish the equilibrium of the Earth system. Both objectives are intrinsically linked and one cannot be reached independently of the other.

It is essential to recognize and affirm that growth has limits. The pursuit of unending development on a finite planet is unsustainable and impossible. The limit to development is defined by the regenerative capacity of the Earth’s vital cycles. When growth begins to break that balance, as we see with global warming, we can no longer speak of it as development, but rather, the deterioration and destruction of our home. A certain level of growth and industrialization is needed to satisfy basic needs and guarantee the human rights of a population, but this level of “necessary development” is not about permanent growth, but rather, balance among humans and with nature.

Costa Rica

Complete submission at http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&type=510&nr=457&menu=20

Similarly, it is vital to establish how to record systematically the contributions to sustainable development that are made by different actors and social and productive sectors at the international, national, regional and local levels. Such contributions are not generally reflected in systems of official statistics, since those are basically designed to record public investments. Significant contributions to progress towards sustainable development are made by efforts related to human resources training, support for local initiatives and vulnerable groups, information and awareness-raising activities, activities with a political impact and support for the rights of vulnerable peoples and groups, campaigns to defend the rights of endangered species and ecosystems, support for production and service programmes, etc.

Ecuador

View complete submission at http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&type=510&nr=281&menu=20

2. New and urgent issues

17. The Conference should encourage recognition of the rights of nature, that is to say, the right to full respect for its existence, maintenance and regeneration of its life cycles, structures, functions and evolutionary processes. States should be urged to take precautionary measures and restrict activities that could lead to the extinction of species, the destruction of ecosystems or permanent changes to natural cycles.

18. We hereby call for a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Nature, as a response that would ensure that present and future generations can live well.

19. Ecuador proposes living well as an alternative to development, as a new paradigm to replace the prevailing model based on endless economic growth, which has led to overexploitation of natural resources and to poverty, inequality and exclusion of the majority of the population. Living well is a work in progress, borrowed from the ancestral knowledge of the indigenous peoples and nationalities, which involves living in harmony with oneself, nature and others to build democratic, inclusive, plurinational and multicultural States.

Paraguay

Rio+20 Submission http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&type=510&nr=429&menu=20

Preliminary proposal of Paraguay for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio +20

2.3. TOOLS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENTRestoring equilibrium with nature requires a recognition of the values inherent in nature, a clear definition of the obligations of human beings toward nature and a recognition of the human right to live in a healthy and ecologically balanced environment (Art. 7 of the National Constitution of Paraguay). Nature has rights that must be respected, promoted and defended; Earth has a right to its vital cycles, a right to regenerate itself, a right not to have its structure modified and the right to interact with the other parts of the biosphere. Unless the rights of nature are respected and safeguarded, it will not be possible to guarantee human rights and achieve sustainable development.

NGOs

Earth Law Center

Earth Law Center urges decision-makers to highlight the following objectives in the Zero Draft, and to prioritize them for adoption and action at Rio +20:

  • Support Earth-based governance, in particular by recognizing and implementing in law the rights of ecosystems and species to exist, thrive and evolve.
  • Endorse and promote adoption of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth and actively support its implementation globally.
  • Re-define “sustainable development” and the “green economy” within the context of Earth-based laws and governance systems that recognize the rights of the natural world, rather than within the limited, injurious context of human-centered, unlimited economic growth and short-term, individual human gain.
    • To ensure this objective is achieved, re-name and re-focus “sustainable development” as “sustainable communities,” a term which includes both human communities and the wider communities of the natural world.
    • This re-focusing is needed to ensure that all elements of sustainable communities are considered. The current, market-based approach distorts communities to serve the economy. Elements of sustainable human communities include not just the economy, but also culture, societal/familial relations, healthy food, clean drinking water, sanitation, housing, necessary medical care, democratic governance, education, meaningful and appropriately rewarded labor, spirituality, civic duty, volunteerism, etc. Sustainable environmental communities similarly require healthy nutrients, clean water, biodiversity, restoration in the face of destruction, and thriving, connected habitats. The economy must be viewed as serving human and environmental communities, not the reverse.

Complete submission http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&type=510&nr=413&menu=20

Global Alliance for Rights of Nature

Complete submission http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&type=510&nr=35&menu=20

To achieve true sustainability, fundamental changes in laws and governance around the world are necessary – to move us from our current path of environmental harm and destruction, to one in which humankind’s relationship with nature is re-established. The Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature supports such change through the worldwide adoption of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth and laws securing the Rights of Nature, such that the rights of ecosystems and natural communities – upon which all life depends – are given the highest societal value and protection in law.

Overview of submission:

We urge the organizers of Earth Summit/Rio +20:

  • to call upon all States, regional bodies, organizations and individuals participating in Rio +20 to adopt the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth and to actively support its implementation through law; and
  • to include Plenary and working sessions on how to facilitate sustainable development in harmony with Nature by recognizing, implementing and defending the rights of Nature/ Mother Earth.

Pachamama Alliance, Four Years.Go

Complete submission http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&type=510&nr=562&menu=20

ON BEHALF OF THE WHOLE, WE REQUEST THAT THESE MEASURES BE ADOPTED AND INCLUDED IN THE AGREEMENTS MADE AT RIO+20:

• Adopt as a fundamental principle the legal distinction of the Rights of Nature: the recognition that every eco-system, and the natural populations of all species that comprise them, have the right to exist, to persist, and to thrive. A model for this can be found in the constitutions of Ecuador and Bolivia.

• Make Ecocide, the environmental equivalent of Genocide, the 5th International Crime Against Peace alongside Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, Crimes of Aggression and War Crimes. A proposal has been put forward that defines ecocide as “The extensive destruction, damage to or loss of ecosystem(s) of a given territory, whether by human agency or by other causes, to such an extent that peaceful enjoyment by the inhabitants of that territory has been severely diminished.”

Rights of Mother Earth

Rights of Mother Earth Proposal Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth

Wild Law UK

Complete submission http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?page=view&nr=39&type=510&menu=20&template=509&str=rights of nature&style=exact&case=&wholeword=

Wild Law UK1 submits the following contributions to the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, for inclusion in a compilation document to serve as a basis for the preparation of a zero draft of the outcome document. This submission sets out our views on how to make the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio +20 Summit) a success. The common belief of those who are part of Wild Law UK is that governance systems, including law, must be rapidly reoriented so that they support, rather than undermine, the long-term health and integrity of the Earth. This approach is known as Earth-centred governance, which recognises that humans are one of the many species making up the amazingly diverse Earth community and seeks to rebalance our relationship with the Earth system.2 Wild Law UK aims to secure rights of nature in law. Wild Law UK consists of more than 100 UK-based legal professionals from the private, public and voluntary sectors and non-lawyers from all walks of life, including students, environmental campaigners, academics, scientists and economists.

Summary

Rio +20 should urgently:

1. Address the need for Earth-centred governance, and recognise the rights of nature to support, rather than undermine, the long-term health and integrity of the Earth.

Additional references

See:  http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/index.php?type=12&page=view&nr=285&menu=20&str=rights+of+nature&style=exact&x=0&y=0

CoNGO Committee on Sustainable Development

Irish Doctors’ Environmental Association (IDEA)

Consortium for the Sustainable Development of the Andes Ecoregion (CONDESAN)

Global Policy Forum Europe

Latin American and Caribbean RegionFood & Water Watch

Women

CELDF releases a Model Bill of Rights Elections Ordinance

January 17, 2012 – Mercersburg, PA:  With the two year anniversary of the Citizens United decision upon us, today the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) released a statement examining the activism that’s emerged in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 decision, and declaring the need to build a broader movement.  (To read the statement, go to: http://celdf.live2.radicaldesigns.org/downloads/CELDF%20CITIZENS%20UNITED%20STATEMENT%20JANUARY%2017%202012.pdf).  For nearly a decade, CELDF has assisted communities to adopt first-in-the-nation laws which refuse to recognize “corporate rights.”

The current activism that’s emerged in the wake of Citizens United – in which the U.S. Supreme Court found that corporate First Amendment “free speech rights” were violated by federal law which limited corporate spending in elections – seeks merely to return to pre-Citizens United days.

Yet, as CELDF examines in its statement, corporate “free speech rights” were around long before Citizens United.  Indeed, the origins of corporate constitutional “rights” can be traced back to the early 1800′s in the U.S., and back even further to English common and ecclesiastical law.  It is that legal legacy which has provided corporations with not only “free speech rights,” but a litany of other constitutional rights and powers.

In its statement, CELDF calls upon communities, activists, and non-profit organizations to recognize the need to frame the problem far more broadly than just a need to return to the days before Citizens United.  As CELDF writes in its statement:

We believe that creating the necessary and desired outcomes requires us to focus not on merely reversing the Supreme Court’s latest expansion of corporate “rights,” but on eliminating the basic (and mostly, unquestioned) authority of corporate minorities to override, and interfere with, democratic decision making by local and state majorities.  It is the usurpation of community decision making authority that must be eliminated if we are to have any hope of building truly sustainable and democratic communities.

In addition, in response to requests from communities, today CELDF released a Model Community Bill of Rights Elections Ordinance – securing the right of people to clean government and fair elections, and the right to be free from corporate activities which interfere with those rights.  (To view the ordinance, go to: http://celdf.live2.radicaldesigns.org/downloads/CELDF%20MODEL%20ELECTIONS%20ORDINANCE.pdf).

The model ordinance eliminates corporate constitutional “rights” – including corporate “personhood rights,” corporate First Amendment “free speech rights,” and Fifth Amendment “equal protection and due process rights.”  Further, the ordinance bans corporations from making contributions or expenditures to influence any election within municipalities which adopt the ordinance.

The model ordinance is drafted to not merely return to a pre-Citizens United legal framework – under which corporations would continue to possess a broad range of constitutional “rights,” powers, and privileges and could actively participate in elections by spending millions of dollars in contributions and expenditures.  Rather, the ordinance is drafted with a recognition that the problems we face are far broader than Citizens United, and therefore our response must be far broader as well.

For more information on the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund …