Layout Image

Archive for environment

United Natures – A United Nations of All Species

United NaturesJust released!  United Natures - a United Nations of all species movie

An indepth documentary feature film on the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, earth jurisprudence, philosophy, permaculture, spirituality and a neo-indigenous future for humanity released on June 1st 2013.

Directed and produced by Peter Charles Downey, United Natures stars some of the world’s most foremost environmental activists and Global Alliance members, Dr. Vandana Shiva, Cormac Cullinan,  Linda Sheehan, Prof. Judith Koons, Dr. Alessandro Pelizzon, Polly Higgins, and numerous others. Click to review the United Natures trailer or for more information at United Natures movie site.

United Natures – a United Nations of all species. Official documentary trailer 2013 from United Natures on Vimeo.

Short Circuit – Lifecycle of Electronic Gadgets and the True Cost to Earth

Gaia - APPCCG
The Gaia Foundation in conjunction with the APPCCG

Report Launch: Short Circuit – The Lifecycle of Our Electronic Gadgets
and the True
Cost to Earth
Wednesday, 24th April 2013, 3:00 – 4:30pm, Committee Room 11,
House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA

We are pleased to invite you to the launch of our new report: Short Circuit – The Lifecycle of Our Electronic Gadgets and the True Cost to Earth, from The Gaia Foundation and collaborative partners including the London Mining Network and Friends of the Earth.

The Short Circuit report follows on from the 2012 report, Opening Pandora’s Box, also launched with the APPCCG in February 2012. Opening Pandora’s Box exposed the global acceleration of land grabbing and environmental destruction by the extractive industries. The Short Circuit report explores one of the drivers of this expansion in mining – the production of consumer electronic products. It looks at each stage of the lifecycle of modern electronic gadgets such as smartphones and laptops, from extraction to production, design and marketing, through to use and disposal. The story of our electronic gadgets is characterised by devastating extractive processes, human rights abuses, complex transnational supply chains, inbuilt obsolescence and rapid technology upgrades, e-waste, toxic waste, and at the heart of it all, the desire to have the latest gadget, no matter what the true cost. The aim of the Short Circuit report is to expose the hidden costs behind these electronic items so that as individuals and as a society we can re-evaluate their true value.

This report launch will bring together a panel to discuss the failings of the current system and the ways in which we can act for change.

Panelists:

  • Liz Hosken, Director, The Gaia Foundation. Gaia and allies are releasing the report.
  • Richard Solly, Coordinator, the London Mining Network. The LMN exposes the role of companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and London-based funders in the promotion of unacceptable mining projects.
  • Julian Kirby, Resource Use Campaigner at Friends of the Earth England, Wales & Northern Ireland. FoE’s Make It Better campaign is calling for tough new laws to ensure that phone manufacturers and other companies reveal the full social and environmental impacts of their supply chains.
  • Sophie Thomas, co-director of design at the RSA (Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce) and co-founder of The Great Recovery Project which is bringing together designers, material experts, manufacturers, retailers, policy makers, government, and consumers to create initiatives which move us towards a circular economy. She is a pioneer in sustainable communication design and Director of Design for the Useful Simple Trust.

If you would like to attend this meeting, RSVP to Helen Strong on helen@gaianet.org or telephone: +44 (0) 207 428 0055. Please enter by Cromwell Green (visitors) entrance and allow about 15 minutes to pass through security.

Are we Infantile?

President Correa declares us “infantile” for questioning his vision of Eco-friendly sustainable growth through mineral exploitation in Ecuador. Are We?

In an interview with New Left Review, President Correa said: “It is madness to say no to natural resources, which is what some of the left is proposing – no to oil, no to mining, no to hydropower, no to roads. This is an infantile left, which can only legitimize the right …. We can not lose sight of the fact that the main objective of a country such as Ecuador is to eliminate poverty.  And for that we need (to exploit) our natural resources.

A comparison of the Hindustan Copper Limited  open pit copper mine, Malanjkhand Copper Mine operating in Madhya Pradesh in India, and the Mirador copper mine at the headwaters of the Amazon River, is alarming.

I believe the Mirador Open Pit Copper Mine, in the headwaters of the Amazon in Ecuador, will be much more damaging than the Malanjkhand open pit copper mine in India.

There are many similarities between the two mines. Size is the big difference. Mirador mine is 10 times larger.

The Malanjkhad mine at present is processing 2 million tons of rock “ore” per year, at the rate of 5,500 tons of “ore” per day. The Mirador Mine will mine 22 million tons of rock “ore” per year, processing a total of 60,000 tons of “ore” per day.

Article 51A of the Indian Constitution says: “It should be the duty of every citizen of India to protect and improve the national environment, including forests, rivers and wildlife and to have compassion for all living creatures ”

In Ecuador, the Rights of Nature are enshrined in the 2008 Constitution. Quite a similarity!

The Malanjkhand mine has been operating since 1982. The environmental consequences of this mine have been written up by the Centre for Environmental Science and Engineering al Bhilai Institute of Technology. The report published by the Environmental Geochem Health in 2007 states that:

The extent of damage to the environment is so high that it can be termed as criminal negligence.

This report ought to serve as a warning to President Correa of ​​Ecuador, who accuses those who oppose his mining “initiative” as being “infantile”!

THE MALANJKHAND MINE in Balaghat district of Madhya Pradesh, in an area that was once forested land on which Adivasis depended.

Malanjkhand Mine in India

The tailings dam at the Malanjkhand copper mine has been “leaching” heavy metals. Molybdenum, nickel, zinc, lead and arsenic have leached into the groundwater and have turned aquifers acidic.

A similar situation in the Mirador Mine is more than likely. Remember the Mirador Mine will be mining 10 times more ore than the Malajkhand mine every day.

The effects of the Malanjkhand mine leaching heavy metals on the surrounding environment are  easily measurable. Five years ago, people from neighboring villages used to harvest 1,500 kg to 2,000 kg of rice per hectare. (0.4 ha).  Here is a quote from the villagers: “Now we barely harvest 300-500 kg per hectare, despite using more fertilizers.

These poisons are not only affecting crop yields, but also human life. A study by Vikas Samvad has shown that the life expectancy for villagers around the mine has dropped from 80 years of life a few decades ago, to a present average of only 55 years.

Forest guard Kalhan Singh from Chindi Tola has said that until 2006 the groundwater remained clean. The acidic mine waste has now contaminated local aquifers. The company has begun providing twice weekly tanker deliveries of water to 10 villages with a total of 1,500 people affected by the poisoned water supplies.

In September last year the residents of 10 villages near the mine staged protests at the nearby Mukki gate of Kanha National Park. They “protested” for 35 days demanding safe drinking water and compensation to 410 farmers affected by lower production yields. The Balaghat district administration asked the Regional Science Laboratory (RSL) of Jabalpur to make a study of the land. The RSL confirmed the presence of acid and heavy metals in the fields.

Researchers have found traces of heavy metals in the nearby Banjar river that flows through Kanha National Park.

The Mirador Mine will be enormous, with mining started at an altitude of 800 meters, mining an open pit down to levels below sea level in an area of ​​more than 200 water sources. The runoff from rainfall of two and a half tons per square meter per year will be enormous, hydrology will be changed, forests will die, fish, mammals and birds will also die, the groundwater will be polluted, lifestyle and culture will be destroyed, and lands will be poisoned.

Are we, in the words of President Correa, “infantile” when we care about our shared heritage, and question his declarations of eco-friendly sustainable growth? Are we?

David Dene, March 2013
Ecologist, Research, and Co-Founder of Protect Ecuador
http://www.protectecuador.org

Sign our petition on Avaaz.com at http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stop_The_Mirador_Open_Pit_Copper_and_Gold_Mine_in_The_Head_Waters_of_The_River_Amazon/?fSJdoeb&pv=1

The case for Rights of Nature in face of the Mirador Open Pit Copper Mining Project

In March 2012, the government of Ecuador signed a contract with Ecuacorrientes (ECSA), a company of Chinese capital to extract copper, gold and silver from the Condor Highland in  southeastern Ecuador.  Today the humid tropical forest of the Condor Highland is one of the richest and most biodiverse areas of South America.

Condor Highlands of Ecuador

Click to sign the Petition

The proposed Mirador Project includes 6 open pit industrial mining concessions in an area encompassing almost 10,000 hectares (25,000 acres). Mirador’s open pit mines will eliminate all the vegetation and the superficial soil layer of the mined area including 4,000 species of vascular plants that contain the richest biodiversity in South America.  Over 6,000 hectares (15,000 acres) the Protected Forest of the Condor Highland will be affected.  The strong case highlights that that Walsh Consultant, hired to make the Environmental Impact Assessment by ECSA, determines that species of amphibians and reptiles, endemic from the zone could go extinct since the fragile habitats where their life depends on will be completely removed with the project and water sources and aquifers will be polluted. In spite of this report the Environmental License was given and the contract signed.

Environmental, human rights, indigenous organizations, and local community members from the Condor region in Ecuador have joined together to file a lawsuit to stop the Mirador Mining Project.  The suit claims that the mine would violate the protected rights of ecosystems guaranteed in the Articles 71-73 on Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution. The case is now being analyzed by the 25th Civil Court of Pichincha against the Ministry of Non Renewable Resources, the Ministry of Environment and Ecuacorriente with the plaintiffs asking to stop the Mirador Mining Project using the precautionary principle to guarantee Rights of Nature, Right to Water and Right to a Decent Life.

The following provides a summary of actions being taken and the case upholding Rights of Nature.

Click on map for a pdf version that includes legend and descriptions of the area.

Map of mine without legend

Summary of the Action for Injunctive Relief for Rights of Nature:

Open Pit Copper Mining Project Mirador

Introduction

Since the emergence of new economic actors in the world’s political sphere, and with the creation of new global hegemonies living within a model of development based on consumption and growth, the needs to exploit natural resources have rapidly ascended. China, one of the important actors of this international struggle for economic hegemony, has seen Ecuador as a strategic enclave to solve its energetic and mineral demands.

Hence, Ecuacorrientes, a company with Chinese capitals, signed a contract to exploit minerals with Ecuador on March 2012, with the award of the Environmental License that allows the open pit exploration and exploitation of thousands of hectares in the Ecuadorian territory, within an area of priceless biodiversity, pristine ecosystems and hydrological basins in perfect state.

The socio-environmental studies, done by the Consultancy Company hired by the same company, Walsh, reveal the irreversible environmental and hydric impacts, of the Project, even leading to the extinction of various species of amphibians and reptiles.

In this sense, the Constitution, that guarantees Rights to Human Beings and Nature, is clear when establishing the Right of Nature to exist and maintain its vital cycles, Rights, which beyond doubt will be violated with the big scale mining activities in Mirador Project.

In like manner, the Ecuadorian Constitution and the Law for Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control, establish the mechanisms to guarantee the Rights contained in the Constitution and the national laws. These mechanisms are called Constitutional Guarantees.  One of these guarantees is the “Acción de Protección” or Action for Injunctive Relief, which was created precisely to repair or impede the violation of a constitutional right, in this case, the Rights of Nature, and the Human Right to Water.

In this concrete case, the act that violated the mentioned rights is the Mining Project “Mirador”, including the Project’s Legal Authorization or Grant “Concesión”, the Environmental License and the Contract between Ecuacorriente and the Ecuadorian State.  Hence, the Action’s Legal Pretention in the definitive suspension of the Project, since, invocating the precautionary principle, it attempts against the Rights of Nature and the Human Right to Water.

Description of the Open Pit Mining Project Mirador

On March 5th, 2012, the Ministry of Non Renewable Resources of Ecuador, signed in Quito the Contract for Mining Exploitation of Mining Project Mirador with the Company of Chinese Capitals, Ecuacorriente (ECSA). This Contract, allows the company to exploit the area located in the Condor Highland for 60 years with the option of extending the period.

The Mirador Project plans the exploitation of copper, gold and silver in a deposit located in the Condor Highland. This Project includes 6 mining concessions in an area of 9,928 hectares (24,532.62 acres).

For ECSA to extract the minerals of the Mining Project Mirador, it will have to make a site of 1.25 km (0.77 miles) of depth, the equivalent of the altitude of 10 buildings similar to Quito’s Basilica. For this purpose, ECSA will extract 60.000 tons of rock per day, the equivalent of approximately 46,000 Grand Vitara cars per day.

Only in 17 years, the mine will generate 144 million tons of rock residues, similar to 5 times the residues the city of Quito generates every year.

At the end of the productive life of the mine, the Company expects to recover a total or 2,208 million pounds of copper and 535.500 ounces of gold.

Impacts on Nature and the Environment with the Mining Project Mirador

According to the socio-environmental information developed by Walsh Consultant for the Environmental Impact Assessment, hired by Ecuacorriente, that then allowed the approval of the Environmental License by the Ministry of Environment, the Mining Project Mirador will have to pump 140 liters of water per second from the rivers Wawayme and Quimi to be used for the chemical treatment of the rock and other services. After the use of the water, it will be mixed with the chemicals and the acid rock with high concentrations of sulfate, to be stored in the landfills for solid wastes and tailings ponds.

The Project will consume 30.6 MW of electric energy, the equivalent of the consumption of the city of Ibarra in Ecuador (with 130 thousand people).

One of the most damaging pollutions caused by the mining activity is the Acid Mine Drainage and the leachates from tailings ponds which occur when rain waters or air get in contact with rocks that have been taken from the subsoil to the surface due to mining activity. This creates the oxidation of sulphurate minerals.

The drainage waters follow their curse until they reach superficial and underground waters and make them acid. The Acid Mine Drainage can irreversible affect the quality of superficial waters and underground aquifers in the affected basins, killing entire species of fish and becoming a danger to human consumption.

Especially in a unique place like the Condor Highland, with so many water sources and aquifers, with intense rains and seismic danger, this Project becomes the perfect formula for an environmental disaster.

It is estimated that the flora of the Condor Highland exceeds the 4,000 species of vascular plants, and according to experts, the regions can have the richest flora of an area of such size in all America.

The exploitation area is a refugee of sensible endemic species, in the edge of extinction, and of great importance for the correct running of the area’s ecosystems and science. Those areas will be majorly affected by the vegetation clearing that will take place before starting the operation of the mine and the dump, causing the complete removal of the habitats of various species, especially of reptiles and amphibians of the area, leading to their extinction.

The Environmental Impact Assessment confirms the danger of extinction of three species of amphibians (allobates kingsburyi, pristimantis prhodostichus and pristimantis incomptus) and a reptile (enyalioides rubrigularis), endemic of the zone of the Condor Highland, in addition to other species considered vulnerable, that could also disappear with the open pit mining project when it eliminates the ecosystems that allow their existence. This does not only mean a direct violation to the Rights of Nature (Art. 71-73 of the Ecuadorian Constitution), but an effect on life itself, as well as the opportunities for creating alternative development activities such as tourism.

Impacts to the Human Right to Water

The Mining Project Mirador is located specifically in the micro basins of the Tundayme and Wawayme rivers, which start at the foothills of the Condor Highland. The Tundayme River begins at a waterfall in this high mountain zone, and the Wawayme River is born at a wetland zone.

These rivers can be affected by the Acid Mine Drainage by introducing highly toxic persistent contaminants that affect the quality of water and that will turn out to be the greatest environmental and economic responsibility that the mining industry currently faces, pollution that can occur during years and decades and that can continue over centuries.

The processes that try to neutralize the acidification of water caused by the Acid Mine Drainage do not eliminate the heavy metals produced by the industry such as cadmium, copper, zinc, arsenic, selenium, among others, that can settle, forming a mud that contains dangerous chemical elements, potentially lethal for all forms of life of the affected ecosystems.

Constitutional Arguments for the Rights of Nature and Water Defense

In Article 73, the Ecuadorian Constitution demands the State to apply “precautionary measures and restriction to activities that can lead to the extinction of species, the destruction of ecosystems or the permanent alteration of natural cycles.”  Moreover, it prohibits the introduction of organic or inorganic organisms and material that can permanently alter the national genetic patrimony.   However, this direct prohibition is eluded when this activity is accepted by the State, knowing that the contaminating pollutants will end up in rivers and ecosystems, permanently altering the natural cycles and the genetic heritage.

The Mining Project Mirador, conceived as an open pit industrial mining, will eliminate all the vegetation and the superficial soil layer, meaning that it will eliminate the Tropical Humid Forest of the Condor Highland which remains in good state of conservation. It will eliminate 4,000 species of vascular plants that contain the richest biodiversity in South America, it will cause the complete removal of the habitats in which endemic amphibians and reptiles in the edge of extinction live, affecting a total area of 6,220 hectares (15,369.95 acres) of the foothills of the Protected Forest of the Condor Highland.

The extinction of species of amphibians and reptiles in these zones is catastrophic considering that these are unique and endemic species; and in general, in the whole ecosystem of the Condor Highland, there will be an irreversible impact due to its magnitude and the time that mining activities last.  This means, that ecosystems will be permanently modified, in spite of their high biodiversity of fauna species, in spite of being one of the largest areas of sandstone with the highest biodiversity of the Andes, and an area of refugee and transit for sensible, endemic species, in the edge of extinction, and of great importance for science.

On the other side, the Mining Project Mirador will affect this mega diverse area without a restoration program related to the impacts on its flora, and without complete studies to cover the lack of information there is about the edge effects on flora and fauna of the zone; without an adequate program to manage and rescue the fauna, and without taking into account the dynamic and profound interconnection of the population of species considered bio indicator species that are now threatened to become extinct.

Due to these reasons and the arguments stated above, and since Article 41 in the Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control states that this type of action can be used against a non-judicial public authority that violates, undermines, lessens or cancels the possession and exercise of their rights, in this case, of Rights of Nature, the action demands to Declare the Mining Project Mirador itself, as a violation of Rights of Nature, including the Project’s Legal Authorization or Grant “Concesión”, the Environmental License emitted by the Ministry of Environment and the Contract for Mineral Exploitation signed by the Ministry of Non Renewable Resources with ECSA, since these are State actions that will produce major damage and infringement of the Rights of Nature, the Right to Water and the Right to a Dignified Life establishes in Articles 71, 73, 66.2, and 12 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.

For more information visit http://protectecuador.org/

 

Global Post Ecuador’s green president pushes massive Chinese mine

 

 

What Would a Down-to-Earth Economy Look Like?

David Korten, YES! Magazine

The most recent YES! Magazine is entitled What Would Nature Do? This latest issue is filled with thought provocative articles looking at our lives and culture through the lens of the question “What would Nature do?”.

Co-founder David Korten raised poignant question in his article:  What Would a Down-to-Earth Economy Look Like?  Clearly this is a pivotal question for our times and for our advocacy for recognizing the Rights of Nature.

A Human Economy Based on Nature

Nature surrounds us with expressions of the organizing principles that make possible life’s exceptional resilience, capacity for adaptation, creative innovation, and vibrant abundance.

Organizing Principle

Wall Street

Nature

Defining value Money Life
Primary performance indicators Growth, financial returns, flows, and assets Life’s abundance, health, resilience, and creative potential
Primary dynamic Competition to maximize self-interest Cooperation to optimize self- and community interest
Decision-making power Global, top-down, centralized, and concentrated Local, bottom-up, and distributed
Time frame Immediate return Sustained yield
Local character Uniform Diverse
Resource control Monopolized Shared
Resource flows Global, linear, one-time use from mine to dump Local, circular, perpetual use, zero waste
Deficits of concern Financial Social and environmental
Measure of efficiency Returns to financial capital Returns to social and natural capital
Growth Infinite growth of money and material consumption A stage in life’s endless regenerative cycles of birth, growth, death, and rebirth

If nature were in charge of creating an enduring human economy, she would surely apply the same principles she applies in natural systems. Her goal would be a global system of bioregional living economies that secure a healthy, happy, productive life for every person on the planet in symbiotic balance with the non-human systems on which we humans depend for breathable air, drinkable water, fertile soils, timber, fish, grasslands, and climate stability. Each bioregional economy would meet its own needs for energy, water, nutrients, and mineral resources through sustained local capture, circular flow, utilization, and repurposing. Decision making would be local and the system would organize from the bottom up. Diversity and redundancy would support local adaptation and resilience.

It takes humility to recognize that what we’ve called progress isn’t always for the better. Sometimes nature’s original idea was a better one.

This should be our goal and vision. With the biosphere as our systems model, we would design our economic institutions and rules to align with nature’s rules and organizing principles. We would replace GDP as the primary measure of economic performance with a new system of living system indicators that assess economic performance against the outcomes we actually want—healthy, happy people and healthy, resilient natural systems. These indicators might be based on Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness Index. We would redirect the time, talent, and money we currently devote to growing GDP, material consumption, securities bubbles, and Wall Street bonuses to producing the outcomes we really want.

We would favor local, cooperative ownership and control. Organizing from the bottom up in support of bioregional self-reliance, our economic institutions would support local decision-making in response to local needs and opportunities. Cultural and biological diversity and sharing within and between local communities would support local and global resilience and facilitate life-serving system innovation.

The result would be an economy based on a love of life that honors the original instructions and conforms to the organizing principles of nature, real markets, and true democracy. The challenge is epic in its proportion and long overdue.

We are Earth’s children; she is our mother. We must honor and care for her as she loves and cares for us. Together we can forge an integral partnership grounded in the learning and deep wisdom of her 3.8 billion-year experience in nurturing life’s expanding capacities for intelligent self-organization, creative innovation, and self-reflective consciousness.

Read the article in Yes Magazine at   What Would a Down-to-Earth Economy Look Like?

David Korten wrote this article for What Would Nature Do?, the Winter 2013 issue of YES! Magazine. David is board chair of YES! Magazine. He holds MBA and Ph.D. degrees from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and served on the faculty of the Harvard Business School. His books include Agenda for a New Economy and the international best seller When Corporations Rule the World.

Clean Water Act 2.0: Rights of Waterways by Linda Sheehan

From HuffingtonPost.com October 15, 2012 by Linda Sheehan of Earth Law Center.

In a decisive display of bipartisanship, Congress passed the U.S. Clean Water Act into law on October 18, 1972, overriding President Nixon’s veto. The Act faced significant hurdles; for example, my own, pre-Clean Water Act childhood in Massachusetts included sewage-choked beaches radiating illness toward those brave enough to approach beckoning waves, and industrial waste discharges that poisoned my favorite fishing runs.

The Act responded to such highly visible insults with clear goals: achieve fishable and swimmable waters by 1983, eliminate the discharge of pollutants into navigable waters by 1985, and prohibit the discharge of toxic pollutants in toxic amounts. Fueled with funding for essential treatment infrastructure, and catalyzed by citizen lawsuits against major polluters, the Act steadily picked off much of the low-hanging pollution fruit.

Read the complete article …

Rethinking society from the ground up – Foundation Earth

One of the most promising aspects of the recent Rio+20 Earth Summit are the creative juices that have been triggered to define new, viable solutions – or identify existing ones for that matter – to redirect the course for the future of our planet.  For Rio+20, Foundation Earth introduced The Economic Rethink: Who does it well? report card to assess what countries are doing some things right for our planet.  The report defines criteria for creating a “deep green economy” and assessing the status of necessary societal shifts in three key areas:  Economy, Ecology, and Equity.

Rights of Nature is defined as an Equity measure.  The first report reflects who is doing well on each of the 16 criteria and how does Brazil, Rio+20′s host country, compare.

Economic Rethink logo by Foundation Earth

The following excerpts are from The Economic Rethink:

The most important environmental or human rights policy is economic policy. That means changing the very basis of the failed system that created the problem. We need a deep green economy – not a green-washing economy. We must ecologize the economy. We can select where it is good to grow, but we must also select where to de-grow. Page three highlights societal shifts in the economic, ecological, and equitable areas to help us think about getting it all right.

Imagine people living without waste, with basic needs met, and in sync with the planet’s nourishing web of life. In our current maddening reality, it can be difficult to picture and achieve this better world. To start, we must help under-consumers (the malnourished and wanting) move up to a sustainable level of consumption while we assist over-consumers (the wasteful and indifferent) down. We must protect the remnants of wild nature and allow for damaged land, water, and sky to heal.

We reviewed more than a dozen scorecards that grade nations on their performance. In this report, we call attention to a short but meaningful list of shifts from around the world that begin to add up to what is necessary to save and restore our planet. We also looked at Brazil, host to global leaders at the June 2012 Rio+20 conference. How does Brazil (or your country) measure up? Remembering that the changes must be commensurate with the scale of the problems at hand, Brazil has a long way to go. Additional material, including footnotes, is on Foundation Earth website at www.fdnearth.org. We welcome your suggestions.

Imagine again for a moment: if every country made the changes suggested herein, we would be well on the way to a more socially just and ecologically sensible way of living – in just one generation. We hope this helps you picture a meaningful shift to a better world.

To view Foundation Earth’s Rio+20 Report Card visit The Economic Rethink: Who does it well?

Be Magnificent – From Redwood Wisdom

I bask in the

Energy created

By all the trees

in this Grove.

Surrounded by their love

And physical support,

I am able to BE

A magnificent tree.

In your life,

Create a network

Of support

Magnificence...from inside a redwood!

For one another,

So that you, too,

May grow

Into your own

Magnificence.

From Redwood Wisdom, by Judith Hurley Prosser

A gift to Robin and the Rights of Nature team in support of our Rio+20 intentions.

Thank you Judith!