Layout Image

Archive for Books and Articles

United Natures – A United Nations of All Species

United NaturesJust released!  United Natures - a United Nations of all species movie

An indepth documentary feature film on the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, earth jurisprudence, philosophy, permaculture, spirituality and a neo-indigenous future for humanity released on June 1st 2013.

Directed and produced by Peter Charles Downey, United Natures stars some of the world’s most foremost environmental activists and Global Alliance members, Dr. Vandana Shiva, Cormac Cullinan,  Linda Sheehan, Prof. Judith Koons, Dr. Alessandro Pelizzon, Polly Higgins, and numerous others. Click to review the United Natures trailer or for more information at United Natures movie site.

United Natures – a United Nations of all species. Official documentary trailer 2013 from United Natures on Vimeo.

Short Circuit Report – the True Cost of Our Electronic Gadgets

Gaia Foundation, ABN, and allies have just launched Short Circuit Report:  The Lifecycle of our Electronic Gadgets and the True Cost to Earth

ShortCircuitReportA new report launched by The Gaia Foundation, African Biodiversity Network (ABN), and allies, exposes the social and ecological atrocities and the toxic legacy of gadgets such as smartphones and laptops. From environmental destruction and contamination caused by extraction, exploitative working conditions during production, to the mountains of e-waste being shipped abroad, the report follows the birth, life and death of everyday gadgets and reveals their true cost to the planet and to future generations.

Short Circuit – The Lifecycle of our Electronic Gadgets and the True Cost to Earth is the follow-up to the 2012 report, Opening Pandora’s Box, which exposed the alarming scale and rate of growth of the extractive industries and the disastrous ecological impact that this is having across the world. Short Circuit turns our attention to a key driver of this growth – the surge in consumerism and an increasingly throw-away culture, fuelled by marketing and illusions of necessity, and supported by the built-in obsolescence of our electronic gadgets.

Among the thought provocative Stories of Creativity included in the report is Reconnecting with Earth Our Source of Life and Law by Carine Nadal which examines how we can re-connect with Earth, relearn her laws, and recognize Rights of Nature.

You can download the full report as a pdf here: SHORT CIRCUIT or read the Executive Summary.

 

Stepping stones – Tom Brenan reviews Exploring Wild Law

From Ecologist, by Tom Brenan

Tom Brenan discovers a wide range of voices from Earth law proponents around the world……

“In his preface to this collection of short articles, the editor Peter Burdon, says that the book is intended to be one step towards fulfilling Thomas Berry’s call for the Great Work ‘to carry out a transition from a period of human devastation of Earth to a time when humans would be present to the planet in a mutually beneficial manner’. While it is focused on law it also aims to appeal to those engaged in science, philosophy, religion and cultural studies.”

…”it is … a very important summary of Earth Jurisprudence’s evolution. Maybe the steps needed aren’t so big after all.”

Read Tom Brenan’s full review at TheEcologist, Stepping Stones

More about Exploring Wild Law from Wakefield Press:
Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence, Peter Burdon (ed.), Wakefield Press, 2011, ISBN 9781862549463
Exploring Wild Law The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence

Wild Law is a groundbreaking approach to law that stresses human dependence on nature. For the first time, this volume brings together voices from the leading proponents of wild law around the world.
Exploring Wild Law, The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence introduces readers to the idea of wild law and considers its relationship to environmental law, the rights of nature, science, religion, property law and international governance.

Compiled and edited by Peter Burdon, Exploring Wild Law is a collection of essays written by leaders in the field of Earth Jurisprudence! Among the authors are Thomas Berry, Ng’ang’a Thiong’o, Peter Burdon, Cormac Cullinan, Klaus Bosselmann, Linda Sheehan, Mari Margil, Judith E. Koons and many others.

A New Civil Rights Movement: Liberating Our Communities from Corporate Control

Today’s global Rights of Nature and Rights of Communities over Corporate “Personhood” movement started over a decade ago in Pennsylvania’s heartland.  Thomas Linzey of Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF.org) has been working in the forefront with these communities.  Read further as Linzey highlights a landmark decision in March 2013 where a Pennsylvania judge holds that corporations are not “persons” under the Pennsylvania Constitution.

Community Environmen​tal Legal Defense FundCELDF.org

A New Civil Rights Movement:
Liberating Our Communities from Corporate Control
A Pennsylvania Judge Holds That Corporations Are Not “Persons”

Under the Pennsylvania Constitution
By Thomas Alan Linzey, Esq., Executive Director
March 28, 2013

To protect small and family farms from industrial factory farms, over a decade ago a handful of Pennsylvania townships picked a fight with some of the country’s largest agribusiness corporations. Recognizing that the state and federal government, rather than protecting them from factory farms, were in fact forcing them into communities, the townships took the unprecedented step of banning corporate farming within their borders.

Thus began the journey to spark a new civil rights movement – one aimed at elevating the right of communities over the “rights” of corporations to use communities for their own ends.

In a departure from the usual David and Goliath story, with one tiny community battling a giant corporation, today there are over 150 “Davids” in eight states that have followed the lead of those Pennsylvania townships. Community by community, they’ve banned corporate “fracking” for shale gas,  factory farming, sludge dumping, large-scale water withdrawals, and industrial-scale energy projects.

But they’re not intent on simply stopping the immediate threat of fracking or factory farming. Rather, they’re adopting Community Bills of Rights that ban such projects as violations of the community’s right to a sustainable energy and farming future. And to protect those Bills of Rights, they are legislatively overturning a slew of corporate legal doctrines – like corporate “personhood” – that have been concocted over the past century to keep communities from interfering with corporate prerogatives.

These communities believe that if ten thousand other localities do the same, that those tremors will begin to shake loose a new system of law – a system in which courts and legislatures begin to elevate community rights above corporate rights, and thus, begin to liberate cities and towns to build economically and environmentally sustainable communities free from corporate interference.

Last week, a Pennsylvania county court gave this new movement a boost – declaring that corporations are not “persons” under the Pennsylvania Constitution, and therefore, that corporations cannot elevate their “private rights” above the rights of people.The ruling was delivered in a case brought by several Western Pennsylvania newspapers which sought the release of a sealed settlement agreement between a family claiming to be affected by water contamination from gas fracking, and Range Resources – one of the largest gas extraction corporations in the state.  Range Resources argued that unsealing the settlement agreement would violate the corporation’s constitutional right to privacy under the Pennsylvania Constitution.

In a landmark ruling, President Judge Debbie O’Dell-Seneca of the Washington County Court of Common Pleas denied the corporation’s request on the basis that the Pennsylvania Constitution only protects the rights of people, not business entities.

In the ruling, Judge O’Dell-Seneca declared that “in the absence of state law, business entities are nothing.” If corporations could claim rights independent from people, she asserted, then “the chattel would become the co-equal to its owners, the servant on par with its masters, the agent the peer of its principals, and the legal fabrication superior to the law that created and sustains it.”
She further found that “the constitution vests in business entities no special rights that the laws of this Commonwealth cannot extinguish. In sum, [corporations] cannot assert [constitutional privacy] protections because they are not mentioned in its text.”

Judge O’Dell-Seneca cited sections of the 1776 Pennsylvania Constitution in support of her contention that corporations were never intended to be constitutionally protected “persons.” She declared that “an even more dubious proposition is that the framers of the Constitution of 1776, given their egalitarian sympathies, would have concerned themselves with vesting, for the first time in history, indefeasible rights in such entities. . . that language extends only to natural persons.”

Finally, she tackled the very nature of corporations by declaring that “it is axiomatic that corporations, companies, and partnerships have no ‘spiritual nature,’ ‘feelings,’ ‘intellect,’ ‘beliefs,’ ‘thoughts,’ ‘emotions,’ or ‘sensations,’ because they do not exist in the manner that humankind exists. . . They cannot be ‘let alone’ by government, because businesses are but grapes, ripe upon the vine of the law, that the people of this Commonwealth raise, tend, and prune at their pleasure and need.”

The court records unsealed by the ruling reveal that Range Resources, and the other corporations which were the subject of the complaint, paid out $750,000 to settle claims of water contamination caused by fracking.

The ruling represents the first crack in the judicial armor that has been so meticulously welded together by major corporations. And it affirms what many communities already know – that change only occurs when people begin to openly question and challenge legal doctrines that have been treated as sacred by most lawyers and judges.

It is that disobedience – of entire communities sitting at lunch counters demanding to be served – that is our only hope of salvation in a world increasingly commandeered by a small handful of corporate decisionmakers intent on remaking the world as their own.

A revolution that subordinates the powers and rights of corporations to the rights of people and nature now waits in the wings. Perhaps now, we’re ready to move it to center stage.

For a printable pdf visit: A New Civil Rights Movement:
Liberating Our Communities from Corporate Control

Grafton, New Hampshire Adopts Community Bill of Rights

Bans Land Acquisition for Unsustainable Energy Systems

Massive wind turbines installed by an Iberdrola project tower over ridges in Grafton County, New Hampshire and have had a devastating impact on the environment and this rural community.  Iberdrola is Spain’s largest energy group and a global leader in wind energy.  Grafton, NH residents learned that Iberdrola was proposing another large industrial wind project that would install wind turbines along other ridgelines in their County.  They turned to CELDF for assistance in defining a plan of action and drafting a Community Bill of Rights.

On Tuesday March 12, 2013, at a Town Meeting residents of Grafton voted to adopt an ordinance that establishes a community Bill of Rights and prohibits corporations from engaging “in land acquisition necessary for the siting or construction of  unsustainable energy systems”.

The ordinance recognizes rights to pure water, clean air, a sustainable energy future  as a “fundamental and inalienable right to protect and preserve the scenic, historic and aesthetic values of the town,” and that the people of Grafton at all times enjoy and retain “an inalienable and indefeasible right to self-governance in the community where they reside.” The ordinance also recognizes natural communities and ecosystems have “inalienable and fundamental rights to exist and flourish within the Town,” and that “residents of the town shall possess legal standing to enforce those rights on behalf of those natural communities and ecosystems.”

Read more at Grafton, New Hampshire Adopts Community Bill of Rights That Bans Land Acquisition for Unsustainable Energy Systems

 

CA Communities Rise Against Fracking

Who decides if fracking happens in a community where YOU live?  With California facing new fracking proposals, communities around the state are rising up.  Global Exchange helps communities to organize,  write laws to protect their communities, and  assert their rights as community.

The Community Rights program led by Director Shannon Biggs of Global Exchange has just released the short video CA Communities Rise Against Fracking to address the questions:

  • What is fracking?
  • What are the dangers of fracking?
  • What can your community do to stop it?

Learn more about the work of Global Exchange and the Community Rights movement at http://www.globalexchange.org/programs/communityrights

Earth guidebook: Cullinan’s ‘Wild Law’

In response to the growing Rights of Nature movement in Vermont, including the proposed Rights of Nature amendment to the Vermont State Constitution, the Burlington Free Press, Burlington, VT has published three articles:

Earth guidebook: Cullinan’s ‘Wild Law’ by Cormac Cullinan, includes excerpts from Cullinan’s “Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice”.  Cormac Cullinan is a South African Environmental Attorney.  A founding and Executive Team member of the Global Alliance for Rights of Nature, Cormac is a global advocate for Rights of Nature.

The law, Marx and Mother Earth by Free Press Staff Writer Joel Banner Baird details the Vermont movement to implement Rights of Nature in the State Constitution as proposed by Stephen Marx.

Earth Law’s long reach by Free Press Staff Writer Joel Banner Baird interviewing Linda Sheehan, Executive Director of the Earth Law Center and instructor of the Earth Law class at Vermont Law School.  Stephen Marx audited Sheehan’s class in 2012.

Earth Law’s long reach

Local actions can – and should – steer environmental jurisprudence at the global level, says Earth Law Center director Linda Sheehan

Read the full interview at Earth Law’s long reach, Burlington Free Press, by Joel Banner Baird, Burlington, Vermont.

To hear Linda Sheehan explain it, legal rights for Earth is a common-sense way to advance the cause of humankind. 

In the interview with Baird, Sheehan talks of Vermont resident Stephen Marx’s proposed Earth-rights amendment to Vermont’s state constitution. The proposed amendment was approved at a Town Meeting by the town of Strafford, Vt in 2012 and is moving forward to other communities.  Marx was a student in Sheehan’s Vermont Law School class on Earth Rights. Also read Stephen Marx’s interview with Baird at  The law, Marx and Mother Earth.

Questioned by Baird, “What’s your biggest challenge right now?”, Sheehan replies:

“The challenge is that we have a structural governance system right now that really drives us and rewards us for consuming the environment.

If you cut down a forest, the fewer environmental regulations that you have to comply with, the better for the balance sheet — because environmental controls are perceived as a cost.

We made up that economic system, and we can make up something different.

First, though, we need to wake people up to this concept that our economic system, our governance system in general, is driving environmental destruction, and that environmental laws will not be enough to stop it, because they buy into the larger economic system.

Once that’s accepted, the challenge is to actually start making that change.”

Read the complete article at Earth Law’s long reach, Burlington Free Press.